Restricting religious practice in the era of COVID-19: The case of the Ethiopian Orthodox Täwahәdo community By: Elias Gebrselassie[1] and Dr Romina Istratii
5 [1] Email contact: eliasgebrselassie@gmail.com |
This essay follows the publication of an article that Dr Istratii
contributed to the Political Theology Network on the 15th of
April under the title “Restricting
religious practice in the era of COVID-19: A de-westernised perspective
on religious freedom with reference to Greece.”
Motivated by similar concerns, the current essay takes a closer look at
restrictions affecting religious practice in the Ethiopian Orthodox
Täwahәdo
community, where measures to respond to the public health crisis have
become increasingly more rigid. While the Ethiopian Orthodox Täwahәdo
faithful comprise a unique community, they share various elements with
their counterparts in Greece, including the deeply intertwined
relationship between religious tradition, historical consciousness and
personal identity, which means that the faith is prominent on all realms
of life. The essay discusses what the prohibition of religious practices
might imply for the Church and the faithful, including material and
spiritual implications, but also by restricting the activity of the
clergy in society. Our objective is to bring these implications to the
attention of the Ethiopian government in an effort to ensure that
current efforts to contain the spread of the virus in the country are
sensitive to the people’s religious living.
Like many states in the
world, the Ethiopian government promptly responded to contain the spread
of the virus outbreak in its territory by
forbidding large public gatherings, including those of a
religious nature. The latest state emergency declaration forbids
gatherings of more than four people, which has meant that many among the
faithful have been unable to continue their religious life as per norm.
In some urban centres, such as the capital city Addis Ababa, measures
have been most rigidly applied, with believers being turned away if they
venture to attend church services. The ban of any gathering over four
people should, technically, deem infeasible the sacraments of Baptism,
Chrismation, Holy Communion, Holy Matrimony and some funeral services
that are typically executed by five people within the Ethiopian Orthodox
Täwahәdo ecclesiastical tradition. In effect, the ban has
been enforced with variability, with many churches continuing Sunday
liturgies behind closed doors while livestreaming to the faithful, and
some even serving the Holy Communion to a few laypeople if they are able
to enter the church’s premises.
In similar ways to
Greece, prior to the introduction of this prohibition and in the early
days of the virus outbreak in Ethiopia, the Standing Holy Synod of the
Church stipulated that church services should be administered by a
reduced number of priests and deacons, asking the faithful to stay home.
Given the faith’s prevalence in the everyday life and consciousness of
the Orthodox Täwahәdo
community, even this decision raised some concerns, especially since a
significant number of adherents had fasted very rigidly during the Great
Lent and expected to conclude it with the Holy Communion. Such responses
might have motivated a letter by the Ethiopian Patriarch to the
government asking for the Holy Communion to be allowed on Good Thursday
and Easter day (ref. no
ል/ጽ/462/15/2012
EC). While restrictions on religious practices were maintained, this
brief interlude generated speculations that the initial response of the
Standing Holy Synod had been guided by the government, which would
suggest an unconstitutional interference. It is important to note that
Ethiopia upholds the separation of state and ‘religion,’ albeit these
being
intertwined in complex ways.
Ethiopia’s federal sub-division has meant that regional governments responded to
the virus outbreak in variable times and ways. The Tigray government,
for example,
was the first to introduce a state of emergency in late March,
passing a series of decisions that forbade large gatherings, such as
weddings and mourning ceremonies, although these did not include any
explicit stipulations about church services. In Aksum, where Orthodox
Christianity was officially embraced in the fourth century, churches
remained open, with attendees following social distancing rules to
prevent the spread of the virus. In other places of Ethiopia, including
Addis Ababa, the faithful were essentially forced to follow the Church
worship during the Holy Week on television. Photos from the past few
days show that churches in the capital are being draconically guarded by
police to discourage the faithful from entering. In parallel, incidents
such as the reported looting of a church (photo below), have caused
added concern among the faithful.
Although implemented in
non-uniform ways across the country, restrictions to religious life are
expected to have important implications for the Church and the faithful,
which need to be recognised and carefully addressed by government in
parallel to implementing measures to contain the virus. As in the case
of Greece, the history of Ethiopia has been closely interwoven with the
Ethiopian Orthodox Täwahәdo
Church (EOTC) and tradition, although the historical association of the
faith with the ruling class has resulted in
unique dynamics in multi-religious Ethiopia. Among the Orthodox
Täwahәdo
adherents, religious conscience and historical consciousness are to a
degree inseparable, and together these largely determine the faithful’s
sense of identity and belonging. Similar to the Orthodox in Greece, and
perhaps to a larger degree in Ethiopia, participating in church services
has been part of daily activity and folklore culture. Many of the
faithful consistently take part in the weekly Divine Liturgy, although
this has been historically preserved to those that the Church considers
to be bodily and spiritually pure, primarily children and the very
young, the married and the very old. The Eucharist is often described by
the faithful as medicine or ‘food’ for Eternal Life. The children and
the youth typically join the weekly Sunday school programme after the
liturgy, although religious education has been weakened in recent
decades due to the expansion of governmental education and other forces
of modernization. Most people have a spiritual father since childhood
and throughout their adult lives, whom they meet frequently in the
church premises or in their homes when priests visit for the regular
religious gatherings. These are only a few of the ways in which the
Church is integral to people’s everyday lives, demonstrating a faith
with clear existential dimensions.
The role of
the Church in society and the impact on the faithful
It was mentioned in the previous essay that the
Orthodox Church in Greece
expended in 2018 over 121
million euro in philanthropic services, supporting the poor and
homeless, single mothers, foreigners and migrants, families with many
children, and other vulnerable groups, such as individuals with
substance abuse and victims of domestic violence, by means of soup
kitchens and ‘agape meals’, shelters, orphanages, endowments and other
services and facilities. It was not possible to retrieve equivalent
numbers for the EOTC but it is well-known that the Church has been
involved in its fair share of philanthropic work. Given the
decentralised structure of the EOTC, this has been delivered through the
work of local churches and priests, monasteries and monks and nuns and
the alms and contributions of the faithful, including the offering of
meals in church, monasteries and during religious gatherings. Some
monasteries in Ethiopia
might be contributing even to sustainable
livelihoods in the surrounding communities.
It is understood that the current restrictions have
already interfered with this philanthropic activity (although, they have
certainly not impeded it), reducing the alms collected by small churches
and monastic centres across Orthodox Ethiopia. Many
of the churches rely on the financial contributions collected from the
faithful to operate and to pay salaries to the clergy, whom they might
be unable to reimburse at this time. Within EOTC ecclesiastical
tradition, clergy must marry before becoming priests, which means that
priests have dependents to care for. Curtailing the salaries of priests,
especially priests outside of urban centres who have lower salaries,
could threaten the wellbeing of their usually large families as well. It
should also be considered that there are many other individuals who
depend on Church-related activities to make a living, such as people who
sell candles, incense or other ecclesiastical necessities typically
outside of churches.
Beyond these material implications, one must consider the psychological
effects and the impact on the pastoral activity of the clergy that such
a rigid prohibition might have on the faithful. In Ethiopia, it is not
unlikely for Orthodox believers to visit their spiritual father when
they face life challenges or problems. When the faithful fall sick, but
especially when sickness is sudden and cannot be medically explained,
Orthodox Ethiopians will normally ask for prayers to be said on their
behalf and will seek to wash with holy water. From the perspective of
dedicated adherents, visiting holy places (e.g. monasteries) is central
to maintaining emotional, spiritual and physical wellbeing. Moreover,
the clergy are often at the forefront of mediating family problems and
community conflict. Dr Istratii’s
research in Aksum found that the local clergy were often at the
frontline of dealing with issues of conjugal conflict and even family
violence, which in most cases they tried to address with sensitivity to
the victim’s predicament, despite often contributing via their own
discourses in the continuation of certain rigid norms around the
conjugal relationship. The influence of religious discourse on societal
norms was found to be
complex and non-uniform, but it is
indisputable that the religious tradition has been potent in local
mentalities, attitudes and vernacular life.
A full and genuine assessment of the effects of restricting church
activity would also have to consider the more positive impact that
faithfulness, and church attendance in particular, might have on the
individual, the family and society overall. Already, since the virus
outbreak and the imposition of lockdowns, evidence of a rise in
mental health problems
and
domestic violence incidents
has been reported across the world. Domestic violence is not necessarily
the outcome of this close cohabitation, but becomes more acute and
threatening where it exists. This is especially pertinent to Ethiopia,
with almost
one in three women
having faced some type of spousal abuse in their lifetime. Previous
studies from North America show that Church attendance
can improve intimate
relationships, while faithfulness (and specifically Orthodox beliefs)
is associated with attitudes of
forgiveness and conflict resolution. The
study
that Dr Istratii conducted in Aksum seemed to consolidate this
relationship, with the majority of female research participants
affirming that going to church and observing the sacraments made their
husbands calmer and more considerate towards them. The implied
associations between religious activity, faith and human behaviour in
intimate relationships should be understood better and considered in
state-led strategies to contain the virus outbreak and to reduce the
possible side-effects of the lockdown. |