INTRODUCTION
“God
became man that we may become gods” (St.
Athanasios).
The Incarnation of God is the
foundation of the Christian faith. Christ is the Son and
Logos (Word) of God who became man. He is not a man who
became god, nor a man who stands in a unique and perfect
relation with God. If the latter were the truth,
Christianity would not differ from Judaism or any other
religion. Orthodox Christianity believes that in Christ, God
himself (God’s Son and Word) became man without ceasing to
be God, so
that we may be restored and clothed with God’s perfections.
The Orthodox Church keeps as crucial and essential treasures
these classical convictions of the Gospel. There are,
however, many contemporary thinkers who regard them as
untenable on the basis of certain critical syllogistic
arguments. They argue that God as a supreme and absolute
power cannot become man if he is really God; that the
eternal and unchangeable cannot become temporal and
changeable, etc. Thoughtful philosophers have been raising
similar points since the early stages of Christian history,
both from within and from without the Church’s context. But
the Church has always regarded such objections as alien to
the Christian truth. Those who propounded them in the past
were characterized as heretics, namely who failed to
understand Christ’s truth.
The main problem of the ancient heretics and the
contemporary critics, as far as the Incarnation is concerned,
stems from their assumption that the Church’s faith in this
is the result of thoughtful reflection upon or subjective
interpretation of the historic event of Christ. For Orthodox
Christians and theologians, however, the Incarnation of the
eternal Son and Logos of God is a given truth. Both the
apostolic kerygma and the patristic dogma project the
Incarnation as an objective datum and divine gift.
When the Fathers of the Church wrote about the Incarnation
their aim was not to explain away the event of Christ, but
rather to expound its soteriological (saving) significance
for all humanity. They did not explain the Incarnation from
any abstract theoretical standpoint. They rather attempted
to bring out the inner logic of it and to bear witness to
its saving effects.
It is this kind of exposition that this article is designed
to provide. The intention is to lay open the Church’s
understanding of the saving meaning for humanity of the
event of the Incarnation of God in Christ, which occupies
the essential place in the witness of the Gospel, the
Apostles and the Fathers. This will be done on the basis of
the most famous work of St. Athanasios “On the Incarnation
of the Divine Logos.”
ST. ATHANASIOS' TREATISE ON THE INCARNATION
St.
Athanasios’ treatise on the Incarnation is still regarded
today as the first thorough and profound exposition of the
event of Christ. It is a continuation of another work, which
bears the title “Against Paganism” (Contra Gentes), the
subject matter of which is summarized in the beginning of
the work on the Incarnation. This work "Against Paganism"
deals with the problem of idolatry—man’s worshipful
attachment to the world (what we call today “secularism”)—caused
by man’s fall from the knowledge of his Creator. The
substance of the problem is the loss on the part of man of
the self‑consciousness that he is ‘logical’ in the sense
that he is “made in the image of God’s Logos” and that the
world does not have an independent logic of its own apart
from the uncreated powers and energies of the Creator Logos.
The results of this problem pertain to man’s existence and
knowledge. Man’s existence is subjected to corruption and
death and man’s knowledge is alienated from the truth of the
world and the vision of God. St. Athanasios maintains that
the Christian reply to this problem and its fatal
consequences is man’s rediscovery of the Creator Logos, who
is the key to the existence of man himself and of the entire
world. This is because through this Logos man will be able
once again to find the Image of God and the reflection of
that image in himself. But man does not turn to the Logos.
Hence the Logos’ intervention or turning to man which is
achieved through His Incarnation.
The treatise "On the Incarnation" by St. Athanasios is
divided into two main parts, the first one dealing with the
meaning of the Incarnation and the second being a reply to
objections raised against it by Jews and Greek philosophers.
It is to the first part that we shall turn our attention
here.
THE EVENT OF THE INCARNATION: GOD BECAME MAN
The
Incarnation is the Event whereby the Logos of God, through
whom God created all and sustains all, has revealed Himself
to human beings by becoming a man among them. Yet, says St.
Athanasios, the human shape of this revelation, instead of
filling men with gratitude, became the occasion for the
rejection of the Creator Logos. Men thought it impossible
and even irrational that God could become man! They were so
used to life without Him that they found it impossible to
believe in Him when He was born as a man among them! For man
to become God and to surpass the weaknesses and limitations
of His created nature was for men a desirable thought, which
could be reasonably maintained. But for God to become man
and taste the futility and littleness of the human
predicament was either a logical nonsense or a ridiculous
scandal.
And yet the logic of the Gospel, says St. Athanasios,
demands the reverse. What men thought impossible, this God
put forward as possible, and thus the futility and littleness
of the human nature is shown to be honorable and powerful
and saving. The true God is not an indifferent impersonal or
ideal God of some kind of metaphysical transcendence. He is
the God who puts on human nature, is nailed on the Cross for
the sake of righteousness, and truly defies human nature
through means seemingly futile and powerless, yet true,
natural and human. The aim of the Incarnation was not just
the revelation of God, but also the salvation and deification
of fallen man, God’s creature. The Cross of the Incarnate
God, then, became the trophy against idolatry and
superstition, because by such means God unmasked the
futility of man‑made religion and ill‑conceived theology
and also justified and renewed human nature as His own
creation.
For St. Athanasios, then, the Incarnation laid down the
right terms of true theology: the deification of man as God
wills it (as His free gift) and not as man aspires to it (as
an arbitrary usurpation of the rights of God). True theology
is not made by man, but is given by God when He becomes man.
This is owed to the fact that the right knowledge of God is
tied up with the right knowledge of man. Hence, God’s
decision first to reveal the true man in His Incarnation and
then to reveal the truth of Himself. To put it in another
way, man becomes a theologian when he becomes true man; and
he becomes true man when he becomes a man in Christ. Far
from opposing humanism, Christian theology (and particularly
the doctrine of the Incarnation) is the key to it, except
that it is divine humanism, God’s life as man.
How does this actually take place? And what is the reason or
reasons which prompted God to follow such a path? What is
the deeper meaning of the Incarnation? These are the
questions that St. Athanasios will try to answer in his
treatise. And I say that he will try, because first of all
he will examine certain “presuppositions” to the
Incarnation. He will tell us that we must first understand
why and how man was initially made man and why and how he
fell from the position that God gave him, in order to
understand why and how God became man for our salvation. In
other words, man’s creation and fall constitute basic
presuppositions to the understanding of the event of the
Incarnation.
MAN’S CREATION AND FALL
Man was not
created by the world, but by God. God created both man and
the world. The Epicureans, like many modern thinkers,
propounded the view that the world (and therefore man) came
to be through an automatic process out of itself. The
Platonists believed that there was a certain creator (demiourgos)
who made man and the entire universe, but they held that the
material from which all things were made actually
pre‑existed the act of creation and was itself eternal. The
Gnostic heretics, who followed ancient oriental religious
traditions, spoke about two cosmic spheres and substances,
which belonged to two rival gods (the good god of spiritual
substance and the evil god of matter) and saw man as being
caught up between these two opposing realms.
Against these theories St. Athanasios expounded the teaching
of the Church, which is based on the Bible and on Divine
revelation. God created all things out of nothing with His
Divine Logos. Therefore every form of cosmological monism or
dualism must be rejected as false. The cause of creation was
God’s immeasurable goodness, and as a result the world and
man are substantially good. God showed His goodness in a
special way in creating man. Because He knew that, being a
creature that came out of nothing, man could not remain in
existence for ever—for every creature that has a beginning
also has an end. He made man in such a way that he may exist
in the Image and the Likeness of God Himself. In other
words, God made man able to communicate with God and to
imitate Him. In this way the iconic relation of human
existence with the ever‑existing and eternal God would
render the former capable of remaining in existence forever.
The commandment, which, according to the Bible, God gave to
the protoplasts [first-created] in paradise concerning the
knowledge of good and evil, had no other purpose than to
safeguard the grace of being in the Image and Likeness of
God, that is man’s free communion with and imitation of his
Creator. By such means the power of immortality and eternal
existence that belongs to God alone would be also secured
for man. In the last analysis the most characteristic
element of St. Athanasios’ teaching on man’s creation is not
so much man’s created existence as it is the free
coordination of this existence with the self‑existing
Creator, the Divine Logos, through the grace of being in the
Image and Likeness.
Man is not a closed circle of existence simply regulated
from a center existing in him. He is rather an open or free
existence capable of communicating with the transcendent and
self‑existing God. Thus St. Athanasios teaches us that the
key to our humanity is the Divine Logos and our communion
with Him. This is precisely the point where our fall takes
place, which incurs the corruption and death of our
existence and causes the drama of human history, which in
turn calls out the saving intervention of the Logos: the
Incarnation.
The fall of man, which is so clearly revealed in his natural
corruption and death, is in the last analysis first man’s
denial to appropriate the grace of his Creator Logos, and
secondly man’s turning to the created and limited world as
the ultimate purpose of his life. This means, says St.
Athanasios, that in our life we no longer imitate or
communicate with the self‑existing (the One Who Is), but
with things that are not. We are mastered by a demonic envy
(the devil’s deceit) that makes us transgress God’s
commandment and leave death and corruption to reign supreme
over our life. The result is that our humanity remains
unfulfilled—we never reach the purpose of our life, which is
immortality and deification.
THE DILEMMA OF THE CREATOR
This
miserable condition of man, says St. Athanasios, puts God,
as it were, in a certain dilemma! If he allows the
transgressor to live, then he runs the risk of being proved
a deceiver, because His original warning about man’s death
in the case of his rejection of the Logos would appear to be
false. On the other hand leaving man to be lost in
corruption and death does not measure up with God’s
character, especially in view of the fact that man became
communicant of the grace of His Image. His truth asks that
man should be left to his loss because this will not
interfere with God’s consistency to His Logos and will not
violate man’s freedom. But God’s goodness wants of Him to
save His creature, whilst His power is capable to do so.
What then should God do with man who is an arbitrary
transgressor?
Perhaps one might consider, St. Athanasios says, that in
this case the easiest operation would be for God to demand
man’s repentance. But the fact remains that repentance does
not satisfy the law of existence, which demands death,
neither does it restore the fatal consequences resulting
upon the human nature from the transgression. Repentance
simply puts an end to sinning, but does not undo the
incurred consequences of sin. Had sin not had such
repercussions, repentance might have sufficed for man’s
salvation. But now, such as sin is, even the grace of the
Image and Likeness cannot operate. Repentance just does not
lead out of the cul-de-sac.
After all this the only solution to the problem of man’s
salvation can be the intervention of the Creator Logos, who
is capable of re‑creating the lost man. Only the Divine
Logos, St. Athanasios says, can keep God’s consistency with
His Creation, represent all men, suffer on behalf of all,
and re‑create all men and all things: because He is the key
to the Creation of the world and especially of man.
THE FIRST CAUSE OF THE INCARNATION: THE DESTRUCTION OF DEATH
It is with
His Logos that God acts again in order to save His creation.
He sends His Word (Logos) to the earth out of infinite love
for man, Him who was never far away. And the Logos, who sees
our plight and the loss of our generation, enters Himself
into our race and is identified with us. He does this by
taking a body like our own from a pure and impeccable Virgin
and makes it personally His own, Himself becoming a man.
With His own human existence the Logos offers as a man a
life of perfect obedience to God, which concludes with His
self‑sacrifice for the sake of all men. The true
self‑sacrifice of Christ is sealed with His death on the
Cross and is vindicated with His resurrection whereby death
is destroyed forever.
The death of Christ, says St. Athanasios, does not occur for
the same reason as our own. We die justly because death has
a right over us on account of our sin. But Christ is just
and sinless and thus He does not die for Himself but for us.
He does not, of course, die as God—for this is quite
impossible—but as man, inasmuch as He has a human existence
identical with our own. He allows Himself to receive death
at the hands of others, because He wants to enter the
ultimate darkness of our fall and illuminate it with His
presence. He dies as man in order to annul the ultimate
strength of death. The death of Christ, of the one who is
just and lays down His life for the unjust, has a universal
meaning, value and effectiveness. It was the death of all
men that Christ accomplished through His death, in the sense
that natural death is no longer the ultimate destiny of any
man.
Our ultimate destiny is now the resurrection of our
creaturely mortal existence to a new condition of
immortality caused by the Resurrection of Christ. Christ is
the first‑fruit and we shall follow. We no longer die as
condemned, but we die in order to rise again and live
eternally with God. This universal significance, value and
effectiveness of Christ’s death is not based simply on the
fact that He was the just and true man who was vindicated by
God when He died in the hands of sinners, but above all on
the fact that He is in the last analysis the Creator Logos
who holds the key to the existence of all men (He is the
God-Man). The Lord’s humanity (His body) is identical with
our own, but it has acquired universal rights for all of us
because it is the humanity of the universal Lord of all (it
is the Divine-Body).
Christ is ultimately “the true God who is above all and for
all”, who in becoming man has regained our lost rights
especially through His Death and Resurrection. The abolition
of death and corruption as the ultimate conclusion to our
destiny and the establishment of the rights to immortality
and incorruptibility for our creaturely human existence is
regarded by St. Athanasios as the first cause of the
Incarnation. The wonder of the whole gift of Christ to us is
not just the return of our humanity from death to life, but
the transformation of that humanity into an external
incorruptible and immortal existence which is new and
demands the renewal of the whole world.
THE SECOND CAUSE OF THE INCARNATION: MAN’S REGAINING THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOD
Apart from
the death of our creaturely existence, our fall has also
been the cause of our ignorance of God. As we saw above,
man’s rational existence implies that he does not simply
enjoy life but also knowledge, and indeed the knowledge of
God. According to St. Athanasios and the other Fathers and
Theologians of our Church, the knowledge of man is not
restricted to the knowledge of the cosmos or of his own
self, but is ultimately connected with the knowledge and
consciousness of God. Without the last one all other kinds
of knowledge can lose their true meaning and become
paradoxically bearers of ignorance.
The knowledge and consciousness of God is ultimately
connected with the grace of the Image and the Likeness of
the Divine Logos given to man at his creation. In the last
analysis man’s knowledge of God is based on his knowledge of
the Logos, who is God’s true Image. By perceiving the Logos
men perceive God and thus receive eternal life, which rests
on His grace. Yet on account of their fall men have
neglected this grace, and as a result they have lost the
ability of perceiving the divine Word (Logos) and through
Him perceiving God. This loss has also meant that they
cannot any more understand the truth of the world or the
truth of themselves, or even the truth which God has sent to
them through the Prophets and the holy men. It was
self‑evident then that the Logos and true Image of the
Father had to be revealed to men once again and revive in
them the grace of the Image that had been darkened.
This is exactly what the Logos did with His Incarnation. Not
only did He revive the mortal body and make it
incorruptible, but He also renewed the grace of the Image of
God in man’s soul and existence. Neither angels nor men,
says St. Athanasios, could have achieved this, but only the
very Logos of God who is God’s true Image. Just as an image
which has been printed on a piece of wood requires the
prototype in order to be restored when destroyed, so the
grace of the Image of the Logos which had been engrafted
upon the soul of man was required in order to be revived
after man’s fall. This is exactly what the Incarnation of
the Logos of God actually brought about: the revival of
man’s rationality, which involves the restoration of the
knowledge and consciousness of God in man and constitutes
the second and ultimate cause of the Incarnation.
For St. Athanasios then there are two basic consequences of
the Incarnation which refer to our salvation and bring out
its inner meaning. First of all the Incarnation has opened
the way for the return of our mortal and corruptible
existence from death to life. Secondly it gives us the
possibility for renewal in our inner man through restoring
to us the knowledge and consciousness of God, which
constitutes the foundation for our true knowledge of the
world and of ourselves. Christ saves us completely, because
He gives us the immortality of our creaturely nature and
makes us communicants of eternal life in the light and glory
of His Kingdom. The Church knows these two fundamental gifts
of Christ to humanity empirically, and therefore her faith
in the God who became man is not the result of a blind
obedience to some dogma superimposed from above. The Church
does not accept the principle, “believe and do not search,”
but the principle, “taste and see that the Lord is good.”
In the last analysis, and as St. Athanasios teaches in other
writings, the proof of the faith of the Church in the
Incarnate God, Jesus Christ the Savior of the World, is
based on the presence and activity of the Holy Spirit. Both
the resurrection of the human nature and the restoration of
the grace of the Image of God in man are the work of the
Father through the Son in the Holy Spirit. The whole
salvation of man, which is achieved and revealed in the
Incarnation of the Son and Logos of God is the work of the
one undivided and consubstantial Trinity of the Father, the
Son and the Holy Spirit, to whom belongs all the glory, the
honor and the worship now and for ever and in the ages of
the ages. Amen.